Peer Review Mechanism

The ASI Journal employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the highest standards of academic quality and research integrity.

Editorial Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to the Applied Science Innovations (ASI) Journal are initially assessed by the Editorial Board to evaluate:

🎯

Journal Scope

Whether the article falls within the journal's focus areas of physical and applied sciences

⭐

Quality Assessment

Evaluation of research quality and sufficiency for peer review consideration

✓

Guidelines Compliance

Verification that manuscripts follow ASI formatting and style guidelines

📝

Grammar & Language

Manuscript must be free from significant grammatical errors and written in clear English

⚖️

Ethics & Integrity

Compliance with applicable standards of research ethics and integrity

🚫

Originality Check

Confirmation that the manuscript has not been published elsewhere

Double-Blind Peer Review

🔍 Double-Blind Review Process

ASI adopts a double-blind peer review process where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous. This ensures impartial and unbiased evaluation of manuscripts.

Review Teams: Each article, review, or short communication is sent to three (3) independent reviewers for comprehensive evaluation.

Acceptance Criteria: Any two (2) positive review reports qualify the paper for acceptance for publication.

Review Recommendations

Reviewers may recommend the following actions for submitted manuscripts:

✅ Accepted with Minor Revision

Manuscript is suitable for publication with only minor improvements required

⚙️ Accepted with Major Revision

Manuscript has potential but requires substantial revisions before publication

❌ Rejected

Manuscript does not meet publication standards and cannot be revised for publication

📋 Author Response

Authors must respond appropriately to every comment raised by the reviewers before a final decision is made on the manuscript. A detailed response document addressing all reviewer comments should be submitted along with the revised manuscript.

Review Timeline

1

Manuscript Received

Initial submission by corresponding author with all required documentation and payment proof.

2

Editorial Assessment

Editorial Board evaluates manuscript against scope, quality, and ethical standards (1-2 weeks).

3

Peer Review

Manuscript sent to three independent reviewers for double-blind review (2-4 weeks).

4

Review Compilation

Editorial Board compiles reviewer feedback and makes preliminary acceptance decision.

5

Author Notification

Authors receive decision and reviewer comments. Revisions requested if applicable.

6

Revision Submission

Authors submit revised manuscript with detailed response to reviewer comments.

7

Final Decision

Editorial Board reviews revisions and makes final acceptance or rejection decision.

8

Publication

Accepted manuscript is copyedited and published in the next issue of ASI Journal.

Journal Website

🌐 Visit Our Website

Stay updated with the latest publications, guidelines, and journal information

www.asijournal.org

ISSN Registration

📚 International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

The International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) is a unique identifier for a continuing resource, such as a magazine or journal. It is obtained from the National Library.

ISSN Status: ASI Journal will obtain its ISSN registration from the National Library after the publication of two (2) journal issues.

This ensures our journal meets all international standards for academic publishing and indexing in global databases.

Once assigned, the ISSN will be displayed on all published issues and will enable the journal to be indexed in major academic databases and search engines worldwide.